FBI Agent Behind Anti-Trump Texts Had a SHOCKING Prediction about Mueller’s Russia Probe

Wow! Here’s an interesting twist to the ongoing controversy, regarding anti-Trump text messages sent between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, FBI attorney Lisa Page.

According to some of those recovered text messages, Strzok didn’t really feel Robert Mueller’s probe would bear much fruit, as far as finding any collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia.

That’s right, folks. Strzok may have been anti-Trump, but he hadn’t convinced himself that there was absolutely collusion, and pretty much scoffed at the idea.

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee released the texts between Strzok and Page. They were sent on May 19, 2017, which would be two days after Mueller was assigned as special counsel.

Strzok was expressing to Page that he was curious as to if he should even join the probe, or should he take his career elsewhere. She urged him not to, but he eventually decided to join Mueller’s team.

In one text, Strzok — the FBI’s deputy counterintelligence chief — said to Page, “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concerned there’s no big there, there.”

Crazy. Compare that to the texts that have Trump loyalists routinely wetting themselves over, and it’s like even though Strzok was less than a fan of Trump, so to speak, he wasn’t on a mission to deem Trump guilty of something, no matter what.

After Strzok and Page’s texts were discovered, Mueller booted Strzok down to FBI Human Resources. Page had already finished her assignment and moved on.

Senator Johnson received a few texts from the Department of Justice last week, and revealed the new discovery earlier Tuesday, during an interview with radio station WISN-Milwaukee.

“I think that’s kind of jaw-dropping,” said Johnson in the radio interview.

“In other words, Peter Strzok, who was the FBI deputy assistant director of the counterintelligence division, the man who had a plan to do something because he just couldn’t abide Donald Trump being president, is saying that his gut sense is that there’s no big ‘there’ there when it comes to the Mueller special counsel investigation,” Johnson added.

There’s a lot of loose talk about a so-called plan, before there was even an investigation, but Strzok seems pretty clear that his belief was that there was no need for a special counsel investigation.

And just like that, Peter Strzok becomes the hero of the Trumpidian hive.

The post FBI Agent Behind Anti-Trump Texts Had a SHOCKING Prediction about Mueller’s Russia Probe appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


“Wonder Woman” Noticeably Absent from Oscar Nominations, and It’s Little Mystery as to Why

Hollywood is bending over backwards to make sure women get noticed this year. Perhaps it’s only right, seeing as how one of the largest virtue signal platforms in the world finally had to come forward and admit it harbored sexual predators of every variety around almost every corner.

But despite its current strategy of figuratively placing its lips squarely on the collective rump of female talent in Hollywood — hopefully this time with consent — one movie featuring a powerful woman is noticeably absent from the current crop of Oscar nominations despite its success and approval.

Wonder Woman was a shining light in an age where super hero movies are a dime a dozen. Directed by female director Patty Jenkins, and starring the beautiful and talented Gal Gadot as its lead, Wonder Woman ended up surpassing 2002’s Spider Man as the number one grossing origin movie for a super hero in the world. If anything, it’s a spectacular example of the ability of women in Hollywood to stand on their own and make something that can blow us all away.

And yet, Hollywood snubbed it for Oscar nominations. Why?

For intents and purposes, it should be counted among Oscar nods left and right despite the fact that it’s a super hero movie. It fits all the criteria necessary for Hollywood love…or so you would think. Wonder Woman ran into too many political troubles to be considered safe for an Oscar nomination. Hollywood, being the left wing haven that it is, couldn’t stomach a few of Wonder Woman’s glaring politically incorrect flaws.

For one, feminists didn’t seem to think Wonder Woman was suitable as a rep for their narrative. She was too sexy, and too beautiful. She was constantly being gawked at by her male companions in the movie, which only made feminists put Wonder Woman in the “for the male gaze” column. What’s more, Diana, Wonder Woman’s real name, was reduced to mush at the site of a baby. Even worse, she learns the value of men, and even falls in love with one! The nerve!

James Cameron may have summed up how Hollywood views Wonder Woman lack of feminism by calling the movie a step backward for women.

“All of the self-congratulatory back-patting Hollywood’s been doing over Wonder Woman has been so misguided. She’s an objectified icon, and it’s just male Hollywood doing the same old thing!” said Cameron. “I’m not saying I didn’t like the movie but, to me, it’s a step backwards. Sarah Connor was not a beauty icon. She was strong, she was troubled, she was a terrible mother, and she earned the respect of the audience through pure grit. And to me, [the benefit of characters like Sarah] is so obvious. I mean, half the audience is female!”

Then there was the problem of Gal Gadot’s past. For many, the fact that a Jewish Israeli woman, who served in the Israeli military and supports Israel openly was too much. They lashed out at Gadot for any pro-Israeli posts she made. This caused conservative Americans to come to her aid, and further distance the left from Gadot who was clearly supported by what Hollywood considers the untouchables.

So a very successful film directed by a woman will get no recognition at the Oscars because it starred the wrong woman, sporting the wrong values, having the wrong looks, and promoting the wrong behaviors. For Hollywood, Wonder Woman was just too…well, American.

This is incredibly sad, as in a world that was being very honest with itself would admit that Wonder Woman is a triumph on many levels. For Hollywood, it was the wrong kind of triumph.

The post “Wonder Woman” Noticeably Absent from Oscar Nominations, and It’s Little Mystery as to Why appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


Evangelical “Leader” Suggests American Christians Prefer Good Policy to the Good News

When a Christian suggests that we can just overlook immoral character, in favor of political policy, you know the salt has lost its saltiness and is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot (Matthew 5:13).

For those puzzling over the reference, in the New Testament times, salt was used to not only draw out the flavor (the good), but to act as antiseptic, and to preserve against decay and putrescence. To describe believers as the “salt of the earth” is a clear directive to act against moral decay and to build up good character, within ourselves, and acting as examples to draw out the good in others.

We don’t draw out good character by giving “mulligans” to those who claim to be brothers or sisters in Christ, and to do so in open view to a world that is lost and needs us to be consistent.

Somebody please forward this to Tony Perkins.

It’s a message I have been trying to make since the primaries of 2015, and so-called Evangelical leaders keep saying things to give me reasons to reiterate.

Perkins, president of the Family Research Council recently expressed his belief in a Politico interview that Donald Trump’s moves in office give him license to ignore what God’s Word teaches about character, the sanctity of marriage, and how we treat the weak and oppressed.

Policy and party over moral and just leadership, always, right?

“We kind of gave him—‘All right, you get a mulligan. You get a do-over here,’” Perkins, the Family Research Council president, told Politico’s “Off Message podcast.”

Perkins said evangelical Christians were “tired of being kicked around by Barack Obama and his leftists.”

I get that. I absolutely do. Former President Obama was an absolute pox on this nation, in regards to his attacks on Christians. No president before Barack Obama was as openly hostile to Christians.

Let us never forget that the Obama administration was willing to cut out police protection and school funding for the state of North Carolina, holding those things over the head of an entire U.S. state, as a means of blackmailing them into allowing men entrance into bathrooms with women and young girls.

(I thank God for a strong governor in Pat McCrory, who planted his feet and stood firm against Obama’s attacks, even as I mourn the stupidity of North Carolina voters who let McCrory go.)

But just because Obama was horrible, that doesn’t mean we should strive to have somebody equally lacking in moral clarity. It should never be about “getting even.”

“And I think they are finally glad that there’s somebody on the playground that is willing to punch the bully,” he said.

Sure. When Jesus was ridiculed, he took to Twitter and made up names for his attackers. When they spit on him and slapped him, it was ON… right?

He added that Christianity is not “all about being a welcome mat which people can just stomp their feet on.”

No, it’s not, but we are to be welcoming. In fact, that’s our mission, far above any political agenda.

That’s a little detail some of these “leaders” like Perkins, Franklin Graham, Dr. Robert Jeffress, and others seem to be missing.

This world is temporal, guys, and 1,000 political gains today mean nothing for our eternity.

Perkins’ comments came as he was questioned about Trump’s reported reference to “sh*thole countries,” as well as his alleged affair with porn star, Stormy Daniels, and the 2016 hush money payoff by his attorney, Michael Cohen.

Certainly, those are issues that should spotlight the moral character (or lack of) of the man, but Perkins insisted that some of Trump’s moves for pro-life issues (we’re still funding Planned Parenthood, so far) and religious freedoms (some recent moves are quite promising) should give the man a pass.

“I don’t think this president is using evangelicals … I think he genuinely enjoys the relationship that had developed. He has found, I think—and he’s a very transactional president,” he said.

“Trust is important to him. Loyalty is important to him, and I think in this transaction, he realizes, ‘hey, these are people I can count on, because they don’t blow with the political winds.’ “

Trump is motivated by self. As long as evangelicals are praising him, he’ll dance in that spotlight. It’s what he does. Should the moment come that they call him out or give him godly rebuke, he’ll cease to be so accommodating.

He continued: “It’s a developing relationship, but I’ll have to say this: from a policy standpoint, he has delivered more than any other president in my lifetime.”

So we’ll see how that works out, in the long run.

He also said he sees Trump as providing the kind of leadership needed for our country and culture, at this time.

How desperately depressing to hear a so-called leader of the Evangelical movement put a man’s agenda ahead of a call to return to the God and the faith of our forefathers. To champion short-term political gains over mercy, love, grace, forbearance, and hope.

This is what’s wrong with the American church. They speak of God with their lips, but deny Him by their actions and their associations.

We’re not reaching the lost, and if you want to know why, just look at Tony Perkins.

 

 

 

The post Evangelical “Leader” Suggests American Christians Prefer Good Policy to the Good News appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State