Scientists Reveal that We’re Not Going to Die From Climate Change Anytime Soon

Good news, everyone! We’re not all going to die from the planet mimicking a global Texas summer.

According to the Daily Wire, scientists have found that the global warming models presented by climate alarmists aren’t as dramatic as what is likely going to happen:

The new study, conducted by climatologist Judith Curry and mathematician Nick Lewis and published in the American Meteorological Society’s “Journal of Climate” on April 23, downgrades the predicted global temperature increases by 30-45% compared to the forecasts of the IPCC.

“Our results imply that, for any future emissions scenario, future warming is likely to be substantially lower than the central computer model-simulated level projected by the IPCC, and highly unlikely to exceed that level,” said Lewis. The study predicts temperature increases of 1.66C and 1.33C compared to the IPCC models’ more dramatic predictions of 3.1C and 1.9C, respectively, a reduction ranging from 45-30%.

The downgraded forecasts of Curry and Lewis were published a few months after a study headed up by the University of Exeter’s Peter Cox, which concluded that the most dire of the U.N.’s climate change models were almost certainly too high. “Our study all but rules out very low and very high climate sensitivities,” said Cox. The scientists significantly narrowed the range of possible temperature changes from the U.N.’s widely variable range of 1.5 – 4.5C to a more moderate 2.2 – 3.4C, with a best estimate of an increase of 2.8C by 2100.

In other words, the changes alarmists at the U.N. predicted were off by quite a bit, and you should never trust an organization with a political aim to do your sciencing for you.

It seems like every year we get another doomsday chart from the church of climate change, and every year nothing happens. At some point, we’re going to have to admit that the debate on climate change isn’t as over as those who push this climate catastrophism say it is. There are so many factors, variables, and unforseen results when it comes to climate change that it’s nearly impossible to predict what’s going to happen decades down the line.

The question isn’t “is the climate changing?” The answer to that is clearly yes, but a changing climate is par for the course when it comes to planet Earth. The planet went through plenty of dramatic changes long before humans arrived. The question is how much is mankind changing the climate, and is it actually having as dramatic an effect as some say it is.

But I don’t want this answer being given to us by scientists and politicians with a motive. I want a clear, and level conversation where I’m not labeled as a social pariah because I didn’t agree with Al Gore’s latest joke of a prediction.

The post Scientists Reveal that We’re Not Going to Die From Climate Change Anytime Soon appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


British Appeals Court Will Hear Alfie Evans Case

Maybe the pressure being put on the UK by the world at large is working, or someone in the UK government has something resembling a heart, but a spark of hope has appeared in the case of Alfie Evans, the baby holding onto life even after UK courts sentenced him to die.

According to Express, the Evans family will now be able to appeal Aflie’s case in the Court of Appeals, hopefully allowing the UK government to release its unnecessary grip on the child and allow him to go to Italy where he will receive an experimental treatment.

Parents Tom Evans and Kate James wish to move their son to Rome, which has already offered to look over the baby at their expense, but the parents were denied by UK courts on the advice of doctors at the Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in Liverpool. The doctors deemed Alfie not long for this world, and judged that any treatment would be prolonging his suffering.

They took Alfie off of life support on Monday, but Alfie continued to live. The doctors have also deprived the baby of any food, and he is now 40 hours without sustenance as of this writing but still hanging on.

According to Express, a medical team from Rome is already there and standing by:

A spokesman for Christian Legal Centre said an air ambulance is waiting outside Alder Hey Hospital ready to take Alfie to hospital in Italy.

President of the Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Mariella Enoc, said his doctors and medical staff are ready for Alfie’s arrival should today’s appeal mean his parents can take their son to Italy for treatment.

Mr Enoc said: “We are ready, the plane is at Rome Ciampino Airport with the doctors on board.

“The Italian Embassy in England is also looking for an ambulance to take the boy from the hospital to the airport.

At this point, no one is certain as to why the British courts are stopping Alfie from receiving care outside of their system. It costs them nothing, and the doctors overseeing Alfie have already been proven wrong on multiple occasion.

As Kira Davis writes, at this point the only reason for Alfie’s predicament is that the UK government is simply torturing Alfie to death in order to keep their socialistic medical system intact by not allowing Alfie to seek better care elsewhere, proving that the UK’s medical system is flawed and worthy of leaving.

The post British Appeals Court Will Hear Alfie Evans Case appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


Racist, Sexist Fresno State Professor: Everyone is Mad at Me Because of Racism, Sexism

Fresno State Professor Randa Jarrar threw herself into the national spotlight by celebrating the death of Barbara Bush and describing her as a racist. She then continued her rants against the Bush family, saying she was happy because former President George W. Bush was somewhere being sad.

Since then, much has been uncovered about Jarrar. Namely that she’s a psychotic social justice warrior of the highest order who treats men, white people, the right, and pretty much anyone not like her with utter contempt. Her bigotry, racism, sexism and hatred for all things is not at all disguised in her speeches and talks, but for Jarrar it goes beyond just words.

Jarrar has openly advocated for the bombing and leveling of a house of someone she didn’t like named “Spencer.” I’m going to assume it was Richard Spencer, a high-profile alt-righter. While it’s perfectly fine to have a healthy loathing for Spencer, if that is the correct one, encouraging his home be leveled or that grenades be tossed in is still a terrorist act.

But if that’s not enough for you, Jarrar is also on camera promoting the hijacking of planes, albeit “non-violently,” and also purchasing guns and getting stupid in the face of Trump’s election.

Jarrar went beyond speech at one point and directed much of the hate she was getting at a help line for people with mental health issues, clogging their lines and preventing help getting to those who needed it.

Needless to say Jarrar is disturbed individual, and she’s currently getting paid with taxpayer dollars to teach kids to think just like her.

But if you think this entire thing has caused Jarrar to reflect upon her actions, or has urged her to apologize for being so heinous you’d be completely wrong. But one must remember that a social justice warrior is never at fault for their own actions. They’re perpetual victims. Everything is the fault of someone else.

Jarrar sent an email to Yahoo News blaming the backlash for her behavior on every social justice warrior’s favorite straw man. It’s because America is, wait for it…racist and sexist:

Jarrar is of Egyptian, Greek, and Palestinian heritage and her writing — including her semi-autobiographical novel, A Map of Home, and her short story collection, Him, Me, Muhammad Ali — often touches upon Arab-American and Muslim-American themes. When asked if she believes she received more abuse because of her ethnic background, Jarrar said she does. “I am not the only person who has stated the belief that Barbara Bush was a racist,” she explained. “But women of color routinely have their tone policed, their justified anger painted as hatred, and their criticism of injustice framed as racism toward white people.”

How original.

It’s not because this woman is vile from top to bottom, but because she’s a victim of the patriarchal system soaked with racism that she’s had so much hate thrown at her.

Jarrar also addressed her gloating over her tenure at the college as a sexist act as well:

“Some may characterize those tweets as gloating,” she explained. “I would say that when a woman states any facts about her employment, she is usually met with charges of arrogance.” She added that her salary, which she came under fire for sharing, is publicly listed.

The reason many are calling for her firing are pardonable. Despite the support for free speech many hold, her promotion of terrorist acts and her actions involving the mental health hotline put the public in the mind of relieving her of our taxpayer dollars at her state funded college.

It’s clear that Jarrar has no intention of changing her mind about how she goes about conducting herself, and if she comes out of this with little more than a tarnished reputation it likely will only embolden her to act out further.

The post Racist, Sexist Fresno State Professor: Everyone is Mad at Me Because of Racism, Sexism appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


Ted Cruz Owns Beto O’Rourke AGAIN After Learning Elizabeth Warren is Trying to Help Him

Of all the people to help defeat a popular sitting Republican Senator in a red state like Texas, enlisting Massachusetts uber-Dem Elizabeth Warren is definitely not one of them.

According to the Daily Kos, Warren has gone “all in” for Beto O’Rourke to take down incumbent Sen. Ted Cruz, which is like asking a very loud cricket to help a jackrabbit take down a lion. This came in the form of Warren sending out an email to Texas Democrats, trying to appeal to whatever “yes we can” feelings they have left over from the Obama era.

From Warren’s fundraising email:

A new poll out last week shows that Democratic Congressman Beto O’Rourke trails Senator Ted Cruz by only three points in the Texas Senate race.

The political insiders had been writing Beto off – saying it’s just too hard for a Democrat to win statewide in Texas. But Beto hasn’t been listening to the pundits. He’s been busy building the biggest, strongest grassroots Senate campaign since our own 2012 campaign in Massachusetts.

And now it’s clear to the whole country: Beto can win. But only if we all do our part.

Help Beto O’Rourke build the biggest grassroots team that Texas has ever seen. Chip in today and help Beto beat Ted Cruz in 2018.

Look, I know that winning a Senate race in Texas is an uphill battle. It’s Texas, for crying out loud!

But Beto is running the only kind of scrappy grassroots campaign that could get it done. He’s practically writing the manual for how to win in Texas in 2018.

But for all the excitement Warren thinks she might generate in the great state of not-at-all-Massachusetts, it has Cruz chuckling.

It also has him noticing a pattern in O’Rourke’s support, and like Wendy David before him, it’s not coming from within Texas.

“First Rosie, then Al Franken, then Chelsea Handler, then Chuck Schumer, then Joe Kennedy, and now Elizabeth Warren…it’s clear that smart, tough Texans are the driving force behind Congressman Beto O’Rourke’s Leftist campaign!” tweeted Cruz.

The punchline here is that O’Rourke is essentially Wendy Davis part deux. The left is all bluster for O’Rourke, but in the end he’s not much more than another Soros backed attempt at turning one of the reddest states in America blue.

And enlisting the help of one of the most hated Democrats is only driving Texans further away. At this point, O’Rourke is a side show.

The post Ted Cruz Owns Beto O’Rourke AGAIN After Learning Elizabeth Warren is Trying to Help Him appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


Women are the Fastest Growing Group Getting Their Concealed Carry Licenses Since Parkland Shooting

A major mass shooting incident like the one seen in Parkland, Florida, in February is enough to shake a lot of people up, but it inspires many to take action. As it turns out, women are the fastest growing group in terms of picking up guns and learning how to use them.

According to the National Carry Academy which trains people in the use of firearms, women earning their concealed carry licenses are up 24 percent since the Parkland shooting. This marks the largest jump ever since July/August of 2016.

According to the NCA, men typically earn 66 percent of the permits issued, but women are now making up half.

NCA Co-Founder Nick Dahlberg said in a statement that there is typically an uptick of women when a mass shooting happens as “these events sometimes shake people’s world views in terms of thinking they will be safe, or that others will protect them.”

However, the NCA notes that there are additional reasons as to the uptick of women looking to arm themselves.

“The NCA speculates women are enrolling at a higher rate for many additional reasons: Women now realize it’s finally time to arm themselves; their husbands urge them to carry a weapon; and many more women are simply scared of being attacked these days,” said the NCA in a statement.

This increase in the interest in firearms isn’t surprising given the national conversation about firearms over the last few months. The NRA has also seen record breaking numbers in terms of interest and donations. Between the obvious fact that being armed gives you a better chance at defending yourself and the fact that there are very loud and powerful entities trying to strip that ability to defend yourself from you, gun courses are sure to see upticks.

Women especially have every reason to want to own a gun, as a firearm levels the playing field against anyone who may wish to do them or their family members harm. With children having recently been put into the cross hairs, many women would likely be able to shoot back in order to defend their kids.

And more power to them. Guns are a girl’s best friend.

The post Women are the Fastest Growing Group Getting Their Concealed Carry Licenses Since Parkland Shooting appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


The NRA Just Broke a 15 Year Fundraising Record, and No One Should Be Surprised

The NRA is an organization that thrives on controversy. The more it or its charge, the 2nd Amendment, are attacked the stronger it gets. It shares this ability with organizations like Chick-fil-A who only grow in influence and cash with every assault.

After the Parkland shooting occurred, the attack on the 2nd Amendment, gun owners, and the NRA began before the bodies had time to cool. This is par for the media course, as the left never lets a crisis go to waste, and pounced on their opportunity to push gun control. This time they did so with gusto, and instead of activists, they used children as a delivery system for their message.

It’s a tactic that sent the gun control argument to new heights, and the relentless assault on the gun-owning public was a sight to behold. There were school walkouts, marches, speeches, commercials, articles, interviews, and Ellen appearances. It was a gun control circus that P.T. Barnum would have thought was a bit much.

But the public definitely did think it was too much, and they ran straight to Fort 2A, also known as the National Rifle Association. Afraid they were going to lose their rights in some form or fashion, the NRA’s numbers grew by leaps and bounds, and so did their donations according to the Miami Herald.

In fact, they grew so much that it broke a 15-year record:

The National Rifle Association’s Political Victory Fund raised $2.4 million from March 1 to March 31, the group’s first full month of political fundraising since the nation’s deadliest high school shooting on Valentine’s Day, according to filings submitted to the Federal Elections Commission. The total is $1.5 million more than the organization raised during the same time period in 2017, when it took in $884,000 in donations, and $1.6 million more than it raised in February 2018.

The $2.4 million haul is the most money raised by the NRA’s political arm in one month since June 2003, the last month when electronic federal records were readily available. It surpasses the $1.1 million and $1.5 million raised in January and February 2013, the two months after the Sandy Hook school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.

According to the Miami Herald, $1.9 million of the $2.4 million total came from small donors who gave less than $200.

This indicates that the push to keep our 2nd Amendment rights nice and unalienable comes from the general public. No one should be surprised by this, however. Despite the ferocity of the protests and campaigns against guns, our gun rights are still here.

The NRA’s Saiyan-like ability to become stronger the more it’s attacked isn’t a testament to the NRA’s political savvy, but to the American people’s clear decision that our guns won’t be going anywhere. The next time the gun grabbers decide to pounce, remember that the NRA’s explosive growth is a clear sign that we’re a gun culture, and we’re going to stay that way.

The post The NRA Just Broke a 15 Year Fundraising Record, and No One Should Be Surprised appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


On Free Speech and the Case of Fresno State Professor Randa Jarrar

A fascinating event happened when Fresno State professor Randa Jarrar appeared on the national stage, and it came in the form of the right coming face to face with its own beliefs and being forced to question them.

To catch you up in case you’re blessedly ignorant of who Jarrar is, she’s a published author and professor who insulted and celebrated Barbara Bush and her family upon her death. As people dug into her past, they found more horrific things that she had done including directing her haters to a mental health hotline causing it to get clogged with angry calls and potentially stopping someone from getting the help they needed, as well as calling for terrorist acts against her political opposites.

But even before the latter two facts had come out, many on the right were calling for Jarrar’s firing from Fresno State. Many on the right, including my RedState colleague Streiff, believe that she should be fired for her disgusting comments. Streiff believes she should be fired because if the players were flipped and the script slightly altered so that it was a right winger saying heinous things about a leftist, then he surely would be fired.

I understand the sentiment, but I’m not sure I agree, and I want to be very clear about my stances on this.

It’s my fondest wish that people like Jarrar be given the platform to spew their noxious bullsh*t into a public setting. People are, by and large, not subscribing to Jarrar’s brand of hate and as such will find themselves walking away from her and those who subscribe to her level of ignorance and bigotry. She is the perfect example of how not to, and I want the people to see that for themselves. I want people to argue her points, and upon finding out that people like her won’t rationally argue, will see that these are elements of our society whose ideas aren’t worth the contents of your trash can.

Don’t get me wrong, I believe that conservative persecution and silencing is deplorable, and that the lengths some colleges and universities go to — be it administrative, student-led, or both — is cowardly, foolish, and wrong. That said, I think that free speech fight is a fight separate from this issue, and that progress is being made on the free speech end.

I’m a free speech advocate through and through. I think ideas, no matter how awful, should be allowed to compete in the public sphere unpunished…so long as it’s not taxpayer funded propaganda or does not actually bring actual physical harm to others or their property.

And here’s the rub. Jarrar is a professor who gets her checks cut from a university that is publicly funded. Jarrar is on camera spewing vitriol and hate toward political opponents, which is fine in my book, but then she immediately turns around and asks that her political opponents be literally terrorized. She suggests their houses be broken into, have grenades thrown into, and leveled. She suggests buying guns and getting stupid. She praises “non-violent” terrorists who hijack airplanes.

Should Jarrar be arrested for saying these things? There’s an argument for and against this that I’m willing to have. Should she be fired for saying these things? Absolutely.

Jarrar is being paid by the state to essentially promote terrorism against the people who pay her wages. If she was saying these things while under the employ of a private business, then I would leave that business to deal with her as they see fit. However, through our taxpayer dollars, she’s under my employ, and she’s under your employ. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to see my tax dollars allowing someone to live comfortably as she promotes the idea of throwing an explosive device in someone’s house because she doesn’t like their politics.

The line here is a simple one to draw. Did a subject actively promote harm to an innocent someone of a political persuasion, religion, race, or ideology, or because a person cut off another at the buffet line? Then he or she should be fired from that publicly funded job.

In the case of Jarrar, her hateful tweets about Barbara Bush, men, Christians, and whoever else — her list of hated entities appears to me longer than I’d like to dedicate to this article — are only so useful to me as I can point out her insanity and reveal that her ideas shouldn’t be listened to or followed. I am concerned about her teaching her hatred to her students, and I believe Fresno State should be, too. They could fire her or not for these comments in particular, and the people can decide to send their students to that school based on Fresno State’s stance.

However, when it comes to actually clogging up the lines of a hotline needed to help those with mental health issues, and promoting actual harm, a line is crossed, and the taxpayer is funding something actually dangerous that I’m sure the vast majority of us would rather not. Now you’re reaching into my wallet and handing her a $100 so she can live comfortably as she suggests planes be hijacked.

If my money is going to lawfully be taken from me without my consent, I’d rather it not go to someone like Jarrar.

The post On Free Speech and the Case of Fresno State Professor Randa Jarrar appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


Insane Fresno State Professor that Celebrated Barbara Bush’s Death Also Once Called for Terrorist Acts

We’ve already established that there is something seriously wrong with the Fresno State professor Randa Jarrar that celebrated the death of former first lady Barbara Bush, but apparently the crazy goes above and beyond nasty words.

According to the Fresno Bee, Jarrar is also on video calling for terrorist acts to happen to people who happen to be guilty of wrong-think, and praising terrorists who hijacked planes in the 60’s and 70’s.

Jarrar is also on camera talking about buying guns and doing “crazy sh*t.” according to the Bee:

“I don’t give a f—. I’m buying guns. I’m an American. I’m buying guns,” she says in one video clip. “The other side is, like, doing some stupid s—. I’m gonna do some stupid s—. I’m tired of, like, being the bigger person — literally am usually — but, like, I’m also just tired of the left being, like, f—ing stupid and being like, ‘No we have to like be gentle’ … no, don’t be f—— gentle.’”

She’s also caught on film saying that a man named “Spencer” needs his house broken into and didn’t understand why his house was still standing.

“It needs to be f—ing broken into,” she said. “People need to f—ing throw grenades into it. I don’t give a f—.”

Watch below:

Jarrar is currently on leave from Fresno State and is under investigation for her tweets against Barbara Bush, however the deeper problem here is that Jarrar is a tenured professor.

While I have to reassert that I am 100 percent a free speech advocate, Jarrar has used her platform to spread hate, and then when anger is returned to her, used that anger to put actual people in harm by directing it all to a help line for people with mental health issues. That alone should be an offense worthy of termination, but to add on to this is the fact that she has promoted actual terrorism and potentially harming others.

Jarrar is clearly a disturbed individual who currently has a job teaching America’s youth. That should worry anyone.

The post Insane Fresno State Professor that Celebrated Barbara Bush’s Death Also Once Called for Terrorist Acts appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


Amy Schumer Proves That a Social Justice Agenda Is Box Office Poison

Social justice politics is like a reverse Midas touch. The moment it comes in contact with something, instead of pure gold, it turns into absolute garbage.

It’s what happened to Twitter, it’s what’s happening to YouTube, and it’s definitely what happens to movies and shows that become weighted down with SJW propaganda.

The latest example is Amy Schumer’s “I Feel Pretty,” a sort of reversal of the “Shallow Hal” movie where Schumer’s character perceives herself as super-model hot after an accident. The movie is meant to promote the idea of body positivity, which is a tenet of the SJW religion. While there’s nothing wrong with being confident in the skin you’re in, this idea is usually promoted in order to make unhealthy lifestyles and body weight okay.

Naturally, no one is buying into the social justice propaganda that Schumer is selling, and as a result, the movie is currently raking in $16 million in ticket sales, which is half of its $32 million budget. Half of those ticket sales go to the theaters, so the studio is actually losing a lot of money here.

But it’s not just the fact that “I Feel Pretty” is a bad movie. It’s the fact that Schumer, the lead actress, is so disliked by movie-going audiences that they have zero interest in watching her in a movie covering a subject they have even less interest in. Schumer’s likability is the weight that is sinking this movie, but it’s Schumer’s own doing.

Paul Bois at the Daily Wire put it best:

As I highlighted last week, several reasons have created the dead-on-arrival status of Schumer’s films. After rising to the top with her Comedy Central sketch show “Inside Amy Schumer,” the comedienne kicked off a promising career on the silver screen with her 2015 hit “Trainwreck,” which debuted to $30.1 million and went on to earn $140.8 million globally. Between 2015 and 2018, however, Schumer downed one-too-many martinis with sycophantic leftists in the Hollywood cocktail scene and followed actress Jennifer Lawrence in the quest to savage her goodwill with American audiences by repeatedly insulting them.

Since then, the cousin of Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer has pushed heavy gun control, endorsed radical feminism at the “Women’s March,” and characterized Trump supporters as “rich, entitled white people” and “very poor people who’ve been tricked into it.”

Schumer’s politics became so toxic during one of her comedy routines, it prompted as many as 200 former fans to boo her and walk out of her show. She has yet to learn that alienating half your customer base with rude insults will only encourage them to stay home.

Schumer made the fatal mistake that many a celebrity does, and that’s buying into the Hollywood bubble’s message that there is only one accepted ideology in America, and everyone hates the few that reject the mainstream social justice narrative. Problem is, the reverse is actually true. Audiences tend not to buy into the SJW narrative, even if some do on the surface in order to avoid being a social pariah. The majority of America has no interest in Schumer’s advocacy.

Schumer bit into what they were selling hook, line, and sinker, and then Schumer did what she does naturally, and took it to an extreme. This going overboard was somewhat funny when it was just crude jokes about her experiences, but when she added the SJW agenda to her act it turned it into the aforementioned garbage. “The Schumer Touch,” we’ll call it.

The Schumer Touch can be seen bringing many things down. The all-female Ghostbusters remake flopped massively due to its focus on an agenda rather than good storytelling. Marvel and DC took a social justice turn for the worst, and as a result, their sales dropped quite a bit. Hollywood award shows have seen their audiences dissipate with every leftist agenda fueled acceptance speech. Even the NFL wasn’t safe as its embracing of social justice drove audiences away by massive numbers. This includes ESPN, who is bleeding their audience at an alarming rate.

The message is clear. America isn’t buying what the SJWs are selling. It’s not the moral movement it makes itself out to be, and only serves to divide Americans, and we get enough of that in our politics. Don’t be an Amy Schumer.

The post Amy Schumer Proves That a Social Justice Agenda Is Box Office Poison appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State


Starbucks is Currently Learning that You Can’t Please SJWs the Hard Way

Starbucks can’t catch a break lately, but that is 100 percent their fault as they fed the social justice monster hoping it would eat them last.

For those not up to date on the coffee chain’s drama, Starbucks called the police on two black men who had not ordered anything, but were instead sitting in their store. Police arrived and asked the men to leave, but police say the men were being uncooperative and arrested the duo.

This, of course, sparked national outrage and social justice protesters stormed the Starbucks where the two men were arrested. It was there that a poor worker named Kevin received the brunt of the mob’s outrage despite his innocence.

Starbucks whose CEO Kevin Johnson immediately pulled out all the stops for damage control. He visited the two men to apologize personally, and instituted a rule that all Starbucks employees must be trained to deal with their own racial biases.

Of course, none of this has the social justice crowd satiated. They don’t just want an apology and a solution, they want Starbucks’ soul.

The Omega Psi Phi fraternity whose fraternity brother, Rashon Nelson, was one of the persons arrested in Starbucks, held a rally attended by some 100 protesters demonstrated against “racial injustice” at the same Starbucks on Sunday. It was there that a city councilman gave a speech demanding more from Starbucks.

According to Yahoo News,

“The actions of the Starbucks corporation are totally unacceptable,” Philadelphia Councilman Kenyatta Johnson told protesters Sunday. “We know they said they’re going to move forward and specifically focus on a training that deals with unconscious bias, but that’s a one-day training.

“We want to see how they’re going to change their culture as it relates to racial insensitivity and also diversity and inclusion as it relates to making sure that everyone who comes to a Starbucks store that lives in the city of Philadelphia should feel welcome,” he added.

In social justice speak this typically means that they want Starbucks to alter their business in some way that will make it more SJW friendly. This usually involves irrational demands that Starbucks corporate will try to meet, and upon doing so will watch as their business starts to lose money and customers. How remains to be seen, but that’s not the point.

The point is, as I’ve highlighted before, that SJWs cannot and will not be pleased. What Starbucks corporate essentially did is hand their business over to the SJW mob, who will in turn dictate how the company proceeds forward in the future. The demands for making everyone who comes to Starbucks feel welcome may start out small, but rest assured it will get more absurd over time. They will create positions within the company that will help them “move forward” in a more “progressive” direction in an attempt to placate the mob.

Many a social media company has attempted to do this, and now YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook are all facing troubles of their own like depleted user bases and the threat of a new IP rising to overtake them in the drop-off. Comics, video games, and movies also suffer from SJW input as no one wants to show up to consume a product that attempts to push a message they don’t want to hear over it.

Rest assured, placation will never happen. There is no such thing as a pleased SJW. They need to be victims, and Starbucks just told them they were victims, and victims at their own hands no less.

The post Starbucks is Currently Learning that You Can’t Please SJWs the Hard Way appeared first on RedState.

Source: Red State